c-84, sector 65, Noida
c-84, sector 65, Noida
Built with AI speed. Delivered under engineering review.
Just Drop Us A Line
We are here to answer your questions 24/7












Vibe coding is describing what you want in plain language and letting a model write the code. Andrej Karpathy named it in early 2025. The interesting part is what it changed. Producing a first working version is now fast. Deciding whether that version is correct is where the time goes, and teams inherit software nobody on the team wrote.
Review is the constraint that remains. Our vibe coding development services run on Guarded Delivery, which puts the review inside the build.
Founders and engineering teams run the same three movements. What changes is the depth of review, the compliance evidence, and how much of the delivery you hand over.
We scope the work, build inside the gates, and hand over a running product with tests, a deployment pipeline, monitoring, and a security review already done.
Faster task completion for developers given an AI assistant in a controlled trial.
Source: GitHub and Microsoft Research, arXiv:2302.06590, 2023
Slower on real tasks for experienced developers using AI, who believed they had been twenty percent faster.
Source: METR, randomized controlled trial, 2025
Of AI generated code fails OWASP Top 10 security benchmarks in independent testing.
Source: Veracode, GenAI Code Security Report, 2025
Guarded Delivery is a harness around the model. The model still writes most of the code, and still writes it fast. The harness decides what it may touch, what it has to prove before anything merges, and what gets recorded so the same fault does not return. The gates are automated and run inside the build, so a slice is specified, generated and verified in one sitting with nothing sitting in a review queue. You keep the head start and you can show the work to an auditor.
A harness needs something to test against. A short specification fixes the data model, the contracts, and the acceptance criteria before generation starts. The benefit is that correct becomes a thing you can check, for the model and for the person reviewing it.
SpecifiedGeneration is bounded to one vertical slice. Everything outside it stays frozen and every file inside stays under 500 lines. The benefit is a known blast radius, so when something breaks the fault sits in a space small enough to read in an afternoon.
BoundedNothing merges unproven. A second model audits the first, tests cover the critical paths, and secrets and auth are checked on the way in. The benefit is that every decision lands in a constitution file, so the same fault cannot come back a month later.
RecordedGuarded Delivery covers the work end to end, from the specification through the release that follows. Each service below stands on its own, so you can hand over the whole build or bring us in for the part your team does not want to own.
A first product built to be kept. We run discovery, write the specification, and generate against it inside review gates, so what you take to users is quick to reach and does not have to be thrown away when they arrive.
The work that makes everything after it checkable. We fix the data model, the API contracts, and the acceptance criteria up front, then shape the prompts and context your team reuses, so the model is aiming at a defined target every time.
Full delivery for products that will carry real customers from day one. Authentication, permissions, error handling, and data integrity are built in as the application is written, not fitted afterwards when something breaks.
New work inside a codebase you already own. We bound each feature to one vertical slice, leave everything outside it frozen, and prove the slice before it merges, so velocity goes up without the existing product moving underneath you.
The harness itself, installed in your pipeline. A second model audits generated code before merge, tests cover the paths that matter, and secrets and dependency checks run on every push, so review keeps pace with generation.
Authentication flows, route level access control, input validation, and secret handling are written and tested as the feature is built. Independent testing puts a large share of AI generated code outside OWASP expectations, which makes it a build time problem, settled while the code is being written.
Separated environments, a repeatable release, logging and error tracking, and a way back. Every release is predictable, watched as it goes out, and reversible, so shipping often stops being the risky part of the week.
Your developers keep building and we review what they ship, flagging what to accept, edit, or reject. Over time the team stops producing the faults we keep catching, which is the point of the exercise.
Heavier engagements for products that are multi tenant, regulated, or sold into enterprise procurement, and for engineering organisations rolling AI delivery out across many teams at once.
AI delivery introduced inside an existing SDLC, with the governance an enterprise already runs on. Change control, evidence, and separation of duties stay intact. We do not build regulated systems from a prompt, and we will say so in the first meeting.
Tenancy, isolation, and access boundaries designed before the first tenant exists. Generated code defaults to single instance assumptions with no caching story, which is inexpensive to settle at design time and expensive to unpick under load.
Products heading into SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR territory. Controls, audit trail, access governance, and the evidence trail are produced as the work happens, so the audit reads a record written as the work happened.
Guarded Delivery installed as an organisation wide standard. Shared prompt and context standards, CI review gates, and a written constitution for AI generated code, so quality does not depend on which engineer opened the editor.
The tools are the easy part. Anyone can open Cursor or Lovable today and have something running by the afternoon. The harness around that code is what takes an engineering function to build, and it has to be built by hand. We offer it as a service, per platform, because Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, Replit, v0 and Base44 each fail differently.
Building the harness in house means standing up an engineering function you do not have yet, or running a change program across teams you would rather leave shipping. Either one costs a multiple of the build itself.
Buying it as a service moves that cost off your balance sheet. We bring the specification discipline, the review gates and the security pass, install them in the platform you already use, and leave them behind when we go.
What surrounds the code decides whether it survives launch, and that part looks much the same whichever platform wrote it.
If the left column already describes your product, the work starts as a repair. We run that as vibe coding cleanup services, a separate engagement with its own scope and estimate.


See how Guarded Delivery takes an idea to a production system your team can keep building on.
See the MethodThe method stays the same and the engagement changes with who is at the keyboard. A solo builder needs review they do not have. An engineering team needs a pair of hands that works the way they already do. Here is how the work lands for each.
You are building it yourself, in Cursor or Lovable, with no team behind you and no one to review what comes back. The speed is real and it is the reason you can attempt this at all. What is missing is the second pair of eyes, so vibe coding for startups tends to work right up until the first paying customer finds the gap you could not see. We supply the review without taking the keyboard away from you.
You already have a business that runs, customers who pay, and a team who depends on the tools working. Now you are building software into it, and the tolerance for a broken release is lower than it was on day one. You need the build to move at the pace the opportunity demands while holding the standard your existing operation already sets. We take the delivery and leave you the decisions.
Your team is already shipping and already using AI tools. What you want is an extra pair of hands who works the way you do, inside your repository and your pipeline, on a slice you can scope and check. Vibe coding for developers works when someone is reviewing the output at the same rate it arrives, which is the part that does not scale with headcount. We ride along on the work and hand it back reviewed.
You are testing what these tools can do on internal business systems, or you have something a team already built and now it has to meet the bar the rest of your estate meets. The blast radius is contained but the governance is not optional. We work inside your change control, produce the evidence as the work happens, and say plainly which systems belong nowhere near a prompt.
What counts as production ready changes with the sector. A booking tool and a payments flow carry different obligations long before either reaches a user. The method stays the same and the specification changes, because the acceptance criteria are set by the industry the product ships into.
See every sector we build for, the compliance and data obligations that shape a specification inside each one, and the delivery models we use to hold the same standard across all of them.
View All IndustriesYou have already picked a tool, a backend and somewhere to deploy. We build inside that exact stack, so your prompts, your history and your deploy target stay where they are. Each platform fails in its own way, and the harness is tuned to what each one gets wrong.
The full app generation platforms most vibe coded products start their life on.




The inline coding tools we build in day to day, working across a codebase file by file.




The tools that generate frontend components and interfaces directly from prompts.

The backends these tools default to, and where the decisions that are costly to undo get made.


Where vibe coded apps ship, and what the release path has to look like before real users arrive.



The languages and frameworks underneath the tool, whichever platform generated the code.
Fourteen things a product needs before real customers depend on it, across the six platforms most vibe coded apps are built in. Every cell links to the vendor's own documentation. Almost every capability exists somewhere on every platform. The work sits in the distance between a documented primitive and a correctly configured one.
| Capability | Lovable 13/14 built in | Bolt.new 11/14 built in | Replit 12/14 built in | Cursor 1/3 built in | v0 by Vercel 7/14 built in | Base44 13/14 built in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generation | ||||||
| Documented core capability | Documented core capability: Bolt Agent | Documented core capability: Replit Agent | Not applicable to this product category | Documented core capability | Documented core capability: Base44 App | |
|
One prompt produces frontend, backend and data layer together. Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
|
||||||
| Documented core capability: Lovable Cloud | Documented core capability: Bolt Cloud | Documented core capability: Replit Agent | Not applicable to this product category | Documented core capability | Documented core capability: Backend Functions | |
|
The platform generates API endpoints and server logic. Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
|
||||||
| Documented core capability: Lovable Cloud Database | Documented core capability: Bolt databases | Documented core capability: Replit Database | Not applicable to this product category | Can generate and execute SQL against a connected database, not a native schema designer: SQL integrations | Documented core capability: Entities API | |
|
The platform designs and deploys database tables or collections. Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
v0 by Vercel
Can generate and execute SQL against a connected database, not a native schema designer
SQL integrations
|
||||||
| Documented core capability | Documented core capability: Bolt Agent | Documented core capability: Replit Agent | Not applicable to this product category | Documented core capability | Documented core capability: Base44 App | |
|
The platform creates user interface elements and layouts. Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
|
||||||
| Engineering controls | ||||||
| Documented core capability: Git sync | Documented core capability: GitHub integration | Documented core capability: GitHub integration | Uses the editor's own Git tooling, no documented branch workflow feature | Documented core capability: GitHub Integration | Documented core capability: GitHub Integration | |
|
The platform connects to version control and supports branches. Cursor
Uses the editor's own Git tooling, no documented branch workflow feature
Reported, not in the vendor's documentation |
||||||
| Documented core capability: Git sync | Documented core capability: Download or GitHub | Documented core capability: GitHub integration | Not applicable, Cursor edits a repository you already own | Documented core capability: GitHub integration | Documented core capability: GitHub Integration | |
|
Users can export the generated source code to an external repository. Cursor
Not applicable, Cursor edits a repository you already own
|
||||||
| Documented core capability: Git sync | Documented core capability: Node.js export | Code can be exported to GitHub or downloaded, then run locally: Git sync or download | Desktop editor operating on local files, not stated as a capability claim: Desktop IDE | Code syncs to a GitHub repository you own, local execution not documented: GitHub integration | Documented core capability: Base44 CLI | |
|
The platform supports running the codebase locally on a developer machine. Replit
Code can be exported to GitHub or downloaded, then run locally
Git sync or download
Reported, not in the vendor's documentation Cursor
Desktop editor operating on local files, not stated as a capability claim
Desktop IDE
Reported, not in the vendor's documentation v0 by Vercel
Code syncs to a GitHub repository you own, local execution not documented
GitHub integration
Reported, not in the vendor's documentation |
||||||
| Documented core capability: Automated tests | No documentation found for native test generation or a test runner | Documented core capability: Replit Agent | Can run test commands in the terminal, no documented test generation or runner: Agent terminal tools | Can run unit tests through terminal commands, no dedicated test runner: v0 agent terminal commands | Documented, limited rollout: Testing Agent | |
|
The platform writes automated tests or provides a test runner. Bolt.new
No documentation found for native test generation or a test runner
Cursor
Can run test commands in the terminal, no documented test generation or runner
Agent terminal tools
v0 by Vercel
Can run unit tests through terminal commands, no dedicated test runner
v0 agent terminal commands
|
||||||
| Production readiness | ||||||
| Documented core capability: Preview environment | Project preview and private site separation, not full staging environment management: Project preview and private published site | Documented core capability: Development and production databases | Not applicable to this product category | Available via third party integration: Vercel Environments | Documented core capability: Staging environments | |
|
The platform provides separate spaces for testing and production. Bolt.new
Project preview and private site separation, not full staging environment management
Project preview and private published site
Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
|
||||||
| Documented core capability: Secrets | Documented core capability: Bolt Database secrets | Documented core capability: Secrets tool | Not applicable to this product category | Documented core capability: Environment Variables | Documented core capability: Secrets tool | |
|
The platform securely stores configuration variables and API keys. Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
|
||||||
| Documented core capability: Lovable Cloud Authentication | Documented core capability: Bolt Database authentication | Documented core capability: Replit Auth | Not applicable to this product category | Added with a third party auth library, no built in end user auth: Auth.js or Better Auth | Documented core capability: Authentication settings | |
|
The platform includes a ready to use user authentication system. Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
v0 by Vercel
Added with a third party auth library, no built in end user auth
Auth.js or Better Auth
Reported, not in the vendor's documentation |
||||||
| Available via third party integration: Supabase | Documented user management and database security, not a full RBAC module: Bolt Database user management and RLS | Documented custom authorization checks, not built in RBAC: Replit Auth and app authorization checks | Not applicable to this product category | No documentation found for generated application end user RBAC | Documented core capability: App roles and data permissions | |
|
The platform allows setting different permission levels for users. Bolt.new
Documented user management and database security, not a full RBAC module
Bolt Database user management and RLS
Replit
Documented custom authorization checks, not built in RBAC
Replit Auth and app authorization checks
Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
v0 by Vercel
No documentation found for generated application end user RBAC
|
||||||
| Operations | ||||||
| Documented core capability: Cloud | Documented core capability: Bolt Cloud hosting | Documented core capability: Replit Deployments | Not applicable to this product category | Documented core capability: Vercel | Documented core capability: Base44 hosting | |
|
The platform provides built in web hosting and deployment. Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
|
||||||
| Documented core capability: Logs | Documented core capability: Bolt Database logs | Documented core capability: Application monitoring | Not applicable to this product category | Available via the Vercel platform the app deploys to: Vercel Observability | Documented core capability: Logs Explorer | |
|
The platform tracks application errors and logs activity. Cursor
Not applicable to this product category
|
||||||
Wherever a platform shows Partial, Via a third party or Not verified, the platform has handed that decision back to whoever is building on it. Guarded Delivery is where those decisions get made and proven.
Mapped from official vendor documentation on 3 September 2026. Open any capability to see how each platform delivers it, with the vendor page behind every claim. 66 of 84 cells are confirmed by a documentation page, 5 are reported from other vendor material, 2 could not be verified either way.

Tell us what you are building and which platform you are building it in. We will send back a one page scope with a timeline and an estimate.
Guarded Delivery runs the same three movements in every engagement. What moves is where the review gate sits. At one end your team keeps generating with the AI tools you already use and we hold the gate over everything that merges. At the other end we own the specification, the generation and the gate, and hand back a running product. The five models below are points on that line.
Five models built around how much of the generation you keep and how much of the review you hand over. Each one runs Scope, Generate and Harden in that order. What changes is who is at the keyboard, who signs the specification, and who has to approve a slice before it merges.

We own the build end to end. Discovery, specification, generation inside review gates, security pass, and the release. You get a running product and a repository your next engineer can read.
A first product with the scope locked before anything is generated. We hold the gate throughout. Price and milestones are agreed against a written specification, so the number does not move unless the scope does.
Senior engineers working inside your repository and your pipeline, on slices you scope. Your reviewers and ours share the gate. Charged by time and material, so the work can follow the product rather than a plan written months ago.
Your team keeps generating with the tools you already use. We hold the gate on every pull request, with the security and test pass run before anything merges. Over time your engineers stop producing the faults we keep catching, which is the point of the engagement.
Our team delivering inside your existing SDLC, at your change board's pace. The compliance evidence is produced as the work happens, so an audit finds a trail that was written while the code was written.
| Scope Driver | What Moves the Number |
|---|---|
| User Stories | How many flows the product has to support at launch |
| Integrations | Every external system the build has to speak to |
| Data Model Depth | Entities, relationships, and the reporting they have to feed |
| Compliance Reach | Whether SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA or GDPR shape the specification |
| Platform Chosen | Each one hands back a different set of decisions |
| Team Involvement | Whether your engineers build alongside us or hand the work over |
| Archetype | Typical Scope | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Guarded MVP | One product, a defined story set, specification through to a reversible release | 4 to 8 weeks |
| Production Build | Full delivery with authentication, permissions, test coverage, pipeline and monitoring | 10 to 16 weeks |
| Enterprise Pilot | Governed delivery inside an existing SDLC, with the compliance evidence produced as work happens | 4 to 8 months |
| Continuous Delivery | Ongoing slices against a live product, scoped and reviewed sprint by sprint | Rolling |
Cost tracks the story set and the scope behind it, so we scope first and quote against a written specification. The drivers above are what move the number.
Tell us what you are building and where the product is today. We will send back a written specification, a timeline and a price.
Request an Estimate
On a Guarded Delivery build, security is decided in the specification. A model generates whatever the prompt implies, and independent testing puts 45 percent of AI generated code outside the OWASP Top 10 benchmarks, so the secrets policy, the authentication flows, the input rules and the access model are all settled before generation starts. Each one is verified at the gate before a slice merges. What goes live has already been through the review a buyer or an auditor will ask about.
Security arrives with a specification of its own, written before the build even starts.
The model works inside rules that were agreed, so review starts from a known baseline.
Nothing reaches your production branch until a person and a pipeline both sign it off.
The evidence exists because the work produced it, which makes diligence a handover.
A vibe coding build faces the same audits as anything else an enterprise buys. Which of these standards applies is settled before generation starts, because each one changes something concrete: the data model, the access rules, the retention policy, or the evidence the pipeline has to emit. We hold the same certifications ourselves, so the controls we specify are the ones we already run.






A product built inside these frameworks does not need a compliance project afterwards. The controls, the audit trail and the documentation come out of the build itself, so the first external review has something to read on day one.
Explore client security & complianceEvery product shape brings its own decisions, and a model will guess at them unless the specification says otherwise. These are the twelve we build most often, so the permission rules, the data model and the integrations that cannot tolerate a retry are already known before generation starts.
The shapes repeat, so the specification for yours starts from ground we have already covered.
See more use cases we coverEvery product here had its scope settled before generation started, and every one passed the same gates on the way out. Different industries, different stacks, one delivery standard.
We are here to answer your questions 24/7
Get all your questions answered.
There is no single answer, and the honest version is that the tool matters less than what happens after it generates. Each platform hands back a different set of decisions, which is what the platform comparison on this page sets out. We build inside the one you have already chosen. If you have not chosen yet, we recommend one against your stack, your compliance reach, and who is going to maintain the result.
Scope, generate, harden, in that order, with a review gate between each. The specification comes first and fixes the story set, the data model and the integrations. Generation then happens in slices small enough for one person to read end to end. Nothing merges until a senior engineer and the pipeline have both passed it, which is what keeps the speed without handing you a codebase nobody understands. The approach section sets out the full sequence.
We scope first and quote against a written specification, because the number tracks the story set and the scope behind it. What moves it is the flows you need at launch, the integrations, the depth of the data model, the compliance reach, the platform, and how much your own team builds alongside us. A Guarded MVP runs 4 to 8 weeks and a production build 10 to 16.
It works when the review keeps pace with the generation. A controlled trial put developers with an AI assistant 55.8 percent faster on task completion. A 2025 METR trial found experienced developers 19 percent slower on real work while believing they had been faster. Veracode puts 45 percent of AI generated code outside the OWASP Top 10 benchmarks. Guarded Delivery exists to close that gap.
The engineering is the same. What differs is where the first draft comes from and how much review that draft needs. A typed first draft carries the intent of the person who typed it. A generated one carries whatever the prompt implied, so the specification has to be written down before generation rather than discovered while typing, and every slice is read before it merges. The saving is in producing the draft. The discipline is in what happens next.
Yes, when delivery runs inside your existing SDLC and produces its evidence as it goes. Enterprise engagements are governed by your change board, with the controls, the audit trail and the documentation coming out of the build itself. The standards section on this page lists what we work to.
Vibe coding development is a delivery method inside our Digital Engineering service line, not a separate practice. The engineers, the review standard and the compliance posture are the same ones described on the Digital Engineering page. What changes is where the first draft of the code comes from, which is why the review gates are written down here.
Yes. We read what exists, write the specification around it, and carry on from there under the same gates. If what you have is a prototype that stalled and needs hardening before it can launch, our vibe coding cleanup service covers that path instead.
You do, from the first commit. Work happens in your repository and your pipeline where you have them, and where you do not we set them up in your accounts. The specification, the threat model and the test suite are handed over with the code.
A conversation about what the product has to do, who uses it, and what it has to comply with. From that we produce a written specification carrying the story set, the data model and the integration list, and we price against it. Nothing is generated before you sign that off.


