Google Hints On A Future Penalty Targeting App Interstitials
August 25, 2015
A few days ago, Google released an interesting case study on its official webmaster blog. This case study had a subtle underlying ominous tone that hinted readers on the fate of websites that might be affected due to app interstitial that force users to download app in order to access “locked content”.
David Morell, a software engineer at Google+, goes on to elaborate in the blogpost by citing their case study regarding Google+ mobile web to establish some interesting facts.
Case Study #1 – Interstitial Enabled On Google+ Mobile
1) A user’s “internal user experience” was poor due to app interstitials. 2) Only 9% of users who landed on interstitial page went ahead to download app.
Case Study #2 – Smart App Banner Enabled On Google+ Mobile
1) On removing interstitial & by applying a “smart app banner” active users went up to 17%. 2) Native app installs where not affected when this “smart app banner” was added to Google+ mobile.
Websites That Are Aggressively Using App Interstitials
Its a fact that no user likes their machine dictating them what to do next. Websites like Pinterest, Quora have been using “App Download Interstitials” for long now to force user to download their apps. Interestingly, another annoying example of App interstitial is Google’s own Gmail.
If you are an iPhone user and have used Safari to try accessing your Gmail, you shouldn’t be alien to this
Before signing off the blog, David Morell, explained that Google+ is now retiring Full Page App Interstitials & advised webmasters to adapt “Smart Web App Banners” to reduce “friction” for users on mobile web.
If you are a web designer or a SEO consultant, Google also released its Mobile SEO guide, right before it rolled out its Mobile Friendly update. This guide gives 7 actionable points to ensure that your Mobile Web is well optimized for Google’s spiders.
While this case study went live on Google’s webmaster blog, Yelps’s CEO – Jeremy Stoppelman tweeted:
Soon after, Jeremy went on to blast Google in an article posted on Search Engine Land by calling it a middleman that is trying to gain a vantage point by trying to stay relevant with its “foreshadowed penalties”. To avoid any controversy, Search Engine Land, included a disclaimer right below this guest post, stating that the views belong to Stoppelman alone.
Google has already been talking about Interstitials, by citing them as a negative signal. Here is a video from 2014, where Jennifer Gove from Google, elaborated on app interstitials leading to a poor user experience:
What are your views about this new Google Update that might affect websites deploying App Interstitial? Is Stoppelman making a valid point? Let us know by sharing your thoughts in comments below.